Main.PSYC611 History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup

November 15, 2011, at 06:17 AM by 173.66.55.54 -
Changed line 134 from:
to:
November 15, 2011, at 06:15 AM by 173.66.55.54 -
Changed line 134 from:
  • Required Reading: Iversen - re-live it
to:
November 08, 2011, at 09:21 AM by 173.66.55.54 -
Changed line 100 from:

Module 3: Multiple Regression and Correlation (MRC)

to:

Module 3: Multiple Regression and Correlation (MRC) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

November 08, 2011, at 09:21 AM by 173.66.55.54 -
Deleted lines 124-128:

Module 4: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)


October 18, 2011, at 07:48 AM by 173.66.55.54 -
Changed line 109 from:
  • Required Reading:
to:
  • Required Reading: Lewis-Beck - entire book
October 18, 2011, at 07:47 AM by 173.66.55.54 -
Changed line 109 from:
  • Required Reading: RR Chapter 11
to:
  • Required Reading:
September 20, 2011, at 08:18 AM by 108.48.30.14 -
Added line 73:
  • Please be sure to complete the questionnaire today (9/20) and then again by Monday (9/26) of next week
September 13, 2011, at 04:10 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Changed lines 64-65 from:
to:
  • Useful sampling distribution webpage I highly recommend you look at it and become familiar with it before doing your first module.
September 06, 2011, at 01:46 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Changed lines 15-16 from:
to:
August 29, 2011, at 02:47 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Deleted line 69:
  • Q&A Form Week 4 Due before 5am Wed.
Changed lines 129-131 from:
  • Q&A Form Week 12 Due Wed. by noon
  • Lecture Notes
  • Required Reading: RR Chapters 13–15
to:
Changed lines 136-138 from:
  • Q&A Form Week 13 Due Wed. by noon
  • Lecture Notes
  • Required Reading: RR Chapters 16–17
to:
Changed lines 147-148 from:
to:
August 29, 2011, at 02:44 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Changed lines 48-50 from:
  • Q&A Form Week 1 Due before 5am Wed.
  • Lecture Notes
  • Required Reading: Rosenthal and Rosnow (RR) Chapters 1 and 2
to:
Changed lines 55-56 from:
to:
Changed line 57 from:
  • Required Reading: RR Chapter 10
to:
  • Required Reading: Bruning & Kintz - Part 1
Changed lines 62-63 from:
to:
Changed lines 71-73 from:
  • Lecture Notes
  • Required Reading: RR Chapters 4–6
  • Optional Reading (choose one):
to:
  • Lecture Notes
  • Required Reading: Carmines and Zeller - entire book
  • Optional Reading:
Changed lines 77-78 from:
to:
Changed lines 83-85 from:
  • Q&A Form Week 6 Due before 5am Wed.
  • Lecture Notes
  • Required Reading: RR Chapter 12
to:
Deleted line 89:
  • No Q&A Form this week
Changed lines 103-104 from:
to:
Changed lines 106-108 from:

Lecture 9: MRC (cont.)

to:

Lecture 9: MRC

Changed lines 113-115 from:

Lecture 10: MRC diagnostics

to:

Lecture 10: MRC (cont.)

Changed lines 120-121 from:

Lecture 11: SNOW DAY!

to:

Lecture 11: MRC diagnostics

August 29, 2011, at 02:37 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Added line 10:
Changed lines 15-16 from:

You can download the latest edition of the syllabus here Third Edition 9/2/2010 - hopefully this is the final version

to:
Changed lines 40-41 from:

Go here to view but not edit

to:

Go here to view but not edit

November 30, 2010, at 09:34 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed lines 150-151 from:

Lecture 14: ANOVA Mixed Designs

to:

Lecture 14: ANOVA Review and Module Demonstration

  • No Lecture Notes - just demonstration of Module 4
November 30, 2010, at 12:35 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Added line 143:
  • Q&A Form Week 13 Due Wed. by noon
November 16, 2010, at 12:51 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Added line 135:
  • Q&A Form Week 12 Due Wed. by noon
November 14, 2010, at 10:44 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 134 from:

Lecture 12: ANOVA

to:

Lecture 12: ANOVA Introduction

Changed line 140 from:

Lecture 13: ANOVA

to:

Lecture 13: ANOVA Factorial Designs

Changed line 146 from:

Lecture 14: ANOVA

to:

Lecture 14: ANOVA Mixed Designs

November 03, 2010, at 01:21 PM by 129.174.60.212 -
Changed lines 111-113 from:
  • Optional Reading (choose one):
to:
November 03, 2010, at 01:20 PM by 129.174.60.212 -
Changed lines 129-131 from:
  • Optional Reading:
to:
November 02, 2010, at 02:28 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Added line 123:
  • Q&A Form Week 10 Due by 10am Wed
Added lines 126-128:
  • Additional Readings:
    • More Multicollineary Reading
    • Additional regression diagnostics notes
Changed lines 132-140 from:

Lecture 11: MRC diagnostics

  • Lecture Notes Δ
  • Required Reading: none
  • Additional Readings:
    • More Multicollineary Reading
    • Additional regression diagnostics notes
  • Optional Reading:
to:

Lecture 11: SNOW DAY!

October 26, 2010, at 09:00 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 116 from:
to:
Changed line 123 from:
to:
Changed line 129 from:
to:
Changed line 142 from:
to:
Changed line 148 from:
to:
Changed line 154 from:
to:
October 26, 2010, at 08:59 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 116 from:
to:
Changed line 123 from:
to:
Changed line 129 from:
to:
Changed line 142 from:
to:
Changed line 148 from:
to:
Changed line 154 from:
to:
October 26, 2010, at 06:51 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Added lines 118-124:

Lecture 10: MRC diagnostics

Deleted lines 127-132:

Lecture 10: MRC diagnostics

October 26, 2010, at 06:24 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Added line 115:
  • Q&A Form Week 9 Due by 10am Wed
October 19, 2010, at 04:08 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 108 from:
  • Q&A FormDue by 10am Wed
to:
  • Q&A Form Week 8 Due by 10am Wed
October 19, 2010, at 04:07 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 109 from:
to:
October 19, 2010, at 10:57 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Added line 108:
  • Q&A FormDue by 10am Wed
October 14, 2010, at 09:45 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 99 from:
  • Great power analysis program for Windows and Mac OSX
to:
  • G*Power - A great power analysis program for Windows and Mac OSX
October 14, 2010, at 09:45 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Added line 99:
  • Great power analysis program for Windows and Mac OSX
October 14, 2010, at 09:43 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 89 from:
  • Optional Reading:
to:
  • Optional Reading (choose one):
Changed lines 91-92 from:
to:
October 13, 2010, at 10:01 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 89 from:
  • Optional Reading (choose one):
to:
  • Optional Reading:
Added lines 96-97:
  • Relevant Links:
    • Online power calculators
October 13, 2010, at 09:58 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed lines 97-98 from:
to:
October 13, 2010, at 09:57 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed lines 93-94 from:
to:
  • No Q&A Form this week
  • Lecture will consist of demonstrations and Q&A session
Changed lines 97-98 from:
to:
October 05, 2010, at 07:33 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 87 from:
to:
October 05, 2010, at 05:42 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Changed lines 90-91 from:
to:
October 05, 2010, at 03:52 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Added line 86:
  • Q&A Form Week 6 Due before 5am Wed.
September 28, 2010, at 05:22 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed lines 39-40 from:

<iframe src=“http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=d2d83rak4379qftuicqisvq92k%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/New_York” style=“border: 0″ width=“800″ height=“600″ frameborder=“0″ scrolling=“no”></iframe>

to:

Go here to view but not edit

September 28, 2010, at 05:19 PM by 173.79.216.118 -
Added lines 37-40:

Module Calendar

<iframe src=“http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=d2d83rak4379qftuicqisvq92k%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/New_York” style=“border: 0″ width=“800″ height=“600″ frameborder=“0″ scrolling=“no”></iframe>

September 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 76 from:
to:
September 28, 2010, at 11:12 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed lines 79-80 from:
to:
September 28, 2010, at 10:55 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Added line 75:
  • Q&A Form Week 5 Due before 5am Wed.
September 21, 2010, at 05:24 AM by 108.106.156.217 -
Added line 68:
  • Q&A Form Week 4 Due before 5am Wed.
September 19, 2010, at 09:13 AM by 173.79.216.118 -
Changed line 68 from:
to:
Changed lines 71-72 from:
to:
September 13, 2010, at 11:48 AM by 96.231.160.45 -
Added line 59:
  • Q&A Form Week 3 Due before 5am Wed.
September 07, 2010, at 01:03 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Added line 53:
  • Useful outside reading
September 07, 2010, at 11:03 AM by 129.174.65.247 -
Added line 51:
  • Q&A Form Week 2 Due before 5am Wed.
September 02, 2010, at 02:32 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Changed lines 14-15 from:

You can download the latest edition of the syllabus here Second Edition 8/29/2010 - getting closer to the final version

to:

You can download the latest edition of the syllabus here Third Edition 9/2/2010 - hopefully this is the final version

August 30, 2010, at 04:34 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed line 44 from:
to:
August 30, 2010, at 12:39 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Changed line 43 from:
  • Q&A Form Week 1
to:
  • Q&A Form Week 1 Due before 5am Wed.
August 30, 2010, at 12:38 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Added line 43:
  • Q&A Form Week 1
August 30, 2010, at 12:22 PM by 129.174.65.247 -
Added lines 25-29:

PSYC 611 Lab

The lab has a different website than the lecture. Please visit this website for more information.

August 29, 2010, at 12:04 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed lines 14-15 from:

You can download the latest edition of the syllabus here First Edition 8/23/2010 - Likely to be error-filled so please do not print

to:

You can download the latest edition of the syllabus here Second Edition 8/29/2010 - getting closer to the final version

August 23, 2010, at 11:16 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed lines 27-29 from:
  1. I will post my notes and optional articles when they come available
  2. If you see a  Δ then the link is dead so there is no need to click on those links
  3. I intend to use this as the first line of communication for all things related to this class; please check it often (i.e., more than weekly).
to:
  1. A  Δ indicates a dead link; wait and I will post something shortly
  2. My notes and optional articles get posted when they come available
  3. I intend to use this as the first line of communication for all things related to this course; please check it often (i.e., more than weekly)
August 23, 2010, at 11:13 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Added lines 25-31:

Important notes about this page

  1. I will post my notes and optional articles when they come available
  2. If you see a  Δ then the link is dead so there is no need to click on those links
  3. I intend to use this as the first line of communication for all things related to this class; please check it often (i.e., more than weekly).
  4. If you find an interesting link relevant to the course material, please send it to me so I can post it here
August 23, 2010, at 11:08 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed line 40 from:
  • Optional Readings:
to:
  • Optional Reading:
Changed lines 46-48 from:
  • Optional Reading (choose one):
to:
August 23, 2010, at 11:06 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed line 31 from:
to:
August 23, 2010, at 11:02 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed lines 14-15 from:
to:

You can download the latest edition of the syllabus here First Edition 8/23/2010 - Likely to be error-filled so please do not print

August 23, 2010, at 11:01 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Added lines 102-104:
  • Additional Readings:
    • More Multicollineary Reading
    • Additional regression diagnostics notes
Deleted line 107:
Deleted lines 128-146:

SEM/CFA Week of 4/27

  • No readings - suggested readings TBA
  • Demonstration slides
  • Topics to cover
    • Latent variable models - advance organizer
    • Latent class models / Cluster models
    • CFA as a restricted case of EFA
    • SEM - structural and measurement models combined

  • Multicollinearity Reading:
August 23, 2010, at 11:00 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed line 61 from:
to:
  • Required Reading: StatSoft Reliability Chapter
Changed line 67 from:
  • Required Reading: NA
to:
  • Required Reading: RR Chapter 12
Changed lines 69-81 from:
to:

Lecture 7: Statistical Power

Changed line 78 from:

Module 3: Data Management and Analysis

to:

Module 3: Multiple Regression and Correlation (MRC)

Changed lines 81-84 from:

Missing Data

to:

Lecture 8: GLM Introduction and MRC

Changed lines 85-93 from:

Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)

to:

Lecture 9: MRC (cont.)

Changed lines 91-94 from:
to:

Lecture 10: MRC diagnostics

Lecture 11: MRC diagnostics

Changed line 107 from:

Misc. Topics

to:

Module 4: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

Changed lines 110-131 from:

HLM/MLM Week of 4/20

to:

Lecture 12: ANOVA

Lecture 13: ANOVA

Lecture 14: ANOVA

SEM/CFA Week of 4/27

Changed line 133 from:
to:
Deleted lines 134-143:
  • Nested variables
  • Hierarchical models
  • Fixed and Random effects
  • Within, Between and Split-Plot designs
  • Linear models that take these into consideration

SEM/CFA Week of 4/27

August 23, 2010, at 10:49 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed line 45 from:
  • Required Reading: Stat Soft? Chapter 1 and Chapter 2
to:
  • Required Reading: StatSoft Chapter 1 and Chapter 2
August 23, 2010, at 10:47 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed lines 44-45 from:
to:
Changed lines 47-54 from:
to:
Changed line 50 from:

Module 2: Hypothesis Testing

to:

Module 2: Scale Development and Hypothesis Testing

Changed lines 53-55 from:

Introduction to Mediation

to:

Lecture 4: Scale Development

Changed lines 57-72 from:

Mediation (cont.)

  • No Lecture Notes: In class demonstration
  • Relevant Links:
    • Mediation Overview
    • Dave Kenny’s Mediation Website
    • Preacher and Hayes SPSS code
    • Online Sobel Test Calculator
    • Facebook Group for Mediation and Moderation

Introduction to Moderation

to:

Lecture 5: Scale Development

Lecture 6: Hypothesis Testing

August 23, 2010, at 10:40 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed line 40 from:
  • Optional Readings (choose one):
to:
  • Optional Readings:
Changed line 43 from:

Lecture 3: EFA

to:

Lecture 3: Introductory Data Analysis (cont.)

August 23, 2010, at 10:40 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed lines 41-42 from:
to:
August 23, 2010, at 10:39 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Changed lines 41-42 from:
  • [[Attach:
to:
August 23, 2010, at 10:33 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Added lines 1-145:

Psychology 611 - FALL 2010

Welcome to the homepage for Psychology 611. Here you will find notes posted for the course, links to additional readings, and various tidbits you might find helpful while learning the course material.

Archives

If you are interested in previous years notes, datasets, and optional readings, you can find all of these details on the following links:

Fall 2006

Syllabus

You can download the latest edition of the syllabus here

Course Synopsis

PSYC 611 is the first course in a two-semester sequence that introduces graduate students to basic social science statistics. Throughout the academic year, you will learn the fundamental building blocks for all social sciences. Those building blocks include:

  • research methods
  • measurement
  • statistics
  • ethics


Lecture Notes and Readings


Module 1: Introductory Data Analysis


Lecture 1: Introduction

Lecture 2: Introductory Data Analysis

  • Lecture Notes
  • Required Reading: RR Chapter 10
  • Optional Readings (choose one):
    • [[Attach:

Lecture 3: EFA

Lecture 4: EFA cont.


Module 2: Hypothesis Testing


Introduction to Mediation

Mediation (cont.)

  • No Lecture Notes: In class demonstration
  • Relevant Links:
    • Mediation Overview
    • Dave Kenny’s Mediation Website
    • Preacher and Hayes SPSS code
    • Online Sobel Test Calculator
    • Facebook Group for Mediation and Moderation

Introduction to Moderation

Moderation (cont.)

  • Lecture Notes
  • Relevant Links:
    • Dave Kenny’s Moderation Website
    • SPSS macros
    • Excel guide to plotting


Module 3: Data Management and Analysis


Missing Data

Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)


Misc. Topics


HLM/MLM Week of 4/20

  • No readings - suggested readings TBA
  • Demonstration slides
  • Topics to cover
    • Nested variables
    • Hierarchical models
    • Fixed and Random effects
    • Within, Between and Split-Plot designs
    • Linear models that take these into consideration

SEM/CFA Week of 4/27

  • No readings - suggested readings TBA
  • Demonstration slides
  • Topics to cover
    • Latent variable models - advance organizer
    • Latent class models / Cluster models
    • CFA as a restricted case of EFA
    • SEM - structural and measurement models combined

  • Multicollinearity Reading:
August 23, 2010, at 10:23 PM by 96.231.160.45 -
Deleted lines 0-127:

Psychology 611

Welcome to the homepage for Psychology 611. Here you will find notes posted for the course, links to additional readings, and various tidbits you might find helpful while learning the course material.


Syllabus


  • Week 1 Readings:

Platt (1964)

Chamberlin (1890)



  • Lecture 3 outline
  • Lecture 3 outline with notes
  • Relevant readings for todays lecture are Meehl’s chapter in Lisa Harlow’s (et. al.) edited volume “What if there were no significance tests?” and Will Shadish, Tom Cook, and Don Campbell’s (2002) book that expanded the ideas presented in the Campbell and Stanley monograph. In particular, I would recommend you read chapter 11 in the Shadish, Cook and Campbell book. Unfortunately I do not have an electronic copy of the chapter but there are plenty of copies of the book around the psychology department. Read these two resources if you have the time and interest.


  • Lecture 4 outline
  • Lecture 4 outline with notes
  • Relevant readings: You might find Darrel Huff’s “How to lie with statistics” an entertaining read after this lecture. In addition, if you found the lecture to be difficult conceptually, I suggest you carefully consider whether the material in the text and in the lecture will be at or near your current level of knowledge. Catching up at this point may be more difficult than you imagine.





Mid-term Exam 10/23

The exam is an open-book, open-notes exam. Feel free to bring whatever you desire to the exam. As I mentioned in class, the exam is rather long so I suggest you not rely on looking up material during the exam because you will run out of time. Speaking of time, I asked all students present on Monday if everyone could manage to get to the class about 15 minutes before class started (i.e., 1:15pm) and everyone said “yes” so we will begin the exam early. I know some of you were away at conferences but I trust that the 15 minute early start will not be a hardship for anyone. If it is, please let me know right away. Thanks.

  • Please read this article for the midterm and be prepared to answer questions related to the topics covered to date that pertain to this article.




  • Lecture 10 will cover the midterm summary report linked above. Please be sure to read it before the class. I intend to use the summary in our continued discussion of multiple regression.


  • Lecture 11 covers ANCOVA and MAN(C)OVA. I suggest you read the chapters before class. In addition, I recommend you read over the this helpful web page. By popular demand, I intend to post the full notes this morning.

  • Lecture 11 with notes



Final Exam - details updated after class

  • Article: Please read this article and answer the questions I will post below on December 4th, 2006.

  • Multiple Choice Exam (December 4th, 1:15pm-4:25pm): The exam will take place in the classroom on December 4th at the usual time we meet for class. I intend to open the doors, hand out the exam at about 1:15pm, and collect the last exam when the subsequent class enters the room.

  • Essay Exam (Available: December 4th, 4:30pm, DUE December 13th, 11:59:59pm): The essay exam consists of two comprehensive questions that pertain to the article above. Please be sure to discuss the article in groups but write your own response. Please, please, please, please do not submit identical answers. We already had a bit of a problem with this and I prefer to avoid these problems altogether. Submit your answers to your TA’s via email. Send the responses as attachments or in the body of the message with the subject line reading “611 Final - Essay Questions” without the quotes. Address each of the following questions in detail and limit your responses to no more than 300 words per answer.

  1. Explain the rationale of the GLM and how it helps organize the rest of the least squares procedures discussed to date. Be specific about each procedure and make sure you provide enough detail so we know you understand the question. (50 points)
  2. In the procedures section under the heading Independent Variable: Skin Tone, the authors state that ratings from two sources were “highly significantly correlated (r = .65, p < .001).” Please explain why this statement does not make sense from what you know about null-hypothesis significance testing. (50 points)
  3. Describe the model used to test the primary hypothesis and explain the decisions and possible ramification of the authors choices. (50 points)

  • Literature Review (Due December 18th): PLEASE NOTE THE NEW DUE DATE Yes, the due date changed because several students asked me to make the changes to allow them to prepare for the new final exam dates. I agreed that the new date would offer you more time to prepare for the exam and more time to generate a better paper. Please let your advisor know that course grades are due on the 20th so I will need to receive their review grades no later than noon on the 19th in order to submit those grades on time before I leave. Thanks.


Final Exam Results

  • Here are the results of the multiple choice section of the final exam. Remember that these points get added to the essay points and then get transfored into a 0–100 scale. I will provide that score for you once the essays are graded and entered. Please look over your exam performance. Anyone interested in seeing their exam results in person is welcome to come by the MRES lab this week. I suggest you come either before 3:30pm on Thursday or between 9am and noon on Friday. Otherwise, you can see the results next week if you are still around.

  • The following grading criteria were used to assign points to the essay responses. Please review the following criteria and see how you think you performed on the essay portion of the final exam. Your grades will be posted by the end of the day on Tuesday, December 19th.

table border=1 width=70% align=right bgcolor=#cccc99 cellspacing=0 cellnr Question 1 cellnr

  • 5 points GLM equation
  • 5 points for error
  • 10 points least squares procedures for parameter estimation
  • 10 points for describing MRC in terms of the GLM
  • 10 points for describing ANOVA in terms of the GLM
  • 10 points for extending to multivariate procedures

cellnr Question 2 cellnr

  • 15 points for an explanation of the NHST
  • 5 points for describing the probability model
  • 10 points for explaining how correlation and any other hypothesis test uses NHST
  • 20 points for explaining why something cannot be highly significant using this logic

cellnr Question 3 cellnr

  • 10 points for identifying all of the relevant variables (DV, main IV, and covariates)
  • 10 points for stating the primary hypothesis
  • 10 points for hierarchical model parsing out the covariates
  • 20 points for accurate decisions and criticism of the authors approach

tableend

December 17, 2006, at 06:36 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed line 104 from:

table border=1 width=30% align=right bgcolor=#cccc99 cellspacing=0

to:

(:table border=1 width=70% align=right bgcolor=#cccc99 cellspacing=0:)

December 17, 2006, at 06:35 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 104-105 from:

(:table border=1 width=30% align=right bgcolor=#cccc99 cellspacing=0 :)

to:

(:table border=1 width=30% align=right bgcolor=#cccc99 cellspacing=0:)

December 17, 2006, at 06:35 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 104-105 from:

Question 1:

to:

(:table border=1 width=30% align=right bgcolor=#cccc99 cellspacing=0 :) (:cellnr:) Question 1 (:cellnr:)

Changed lines 115-117 from:

Question 2:

to:

(:cellnr:) Question 2 (:cellnr:)

Changed lines 122-124 from:

Question 3:

to:

(:cellnr:) Question 3 (:cellnr:)

Added line 129:

(:tableend:)

December 17, 2006, at 06:29 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 104-125 from:
  1. Question 1:

5 points GLM equation 5 points for error 10 points least squares procedures for parameter estimation 10 points for describing MRC in terms of the GLM 10 points for describing ANOVA in terms of the GLM 10 points for extending to multivariate procedures

  1. Question 2:

15 points for an explanation of the NHST 5 points for describing the probability model 10 points for explaining how correlation and any other hypothesis test uses NHST 20 points for explaining why something cannot be highly significant using this logic

  1. Question 3:

10 points for identifying all of the relevant variables (DV, main IV, and covariates) 10 points for stating the primary hypothesis 10 points for hierarchical model parsing out the covariates 20 points for accurate decisions and criticism of the authors approach

to:

Question 1:

  • 5 points GLM equation
  • 5 points for error
  • 10 points least squares procedures for parameter estimation
  • 10 points for describing MRC in terms of the GLM
  • 10 points for describing ANOVA in terms of the GLM
  • 10 points for extending to multivariate procedures

Question 2:

  • 15 points for an explanation of the NHST
  • 5 points for describing the probability model
  • 10 points for explaining how correlation and any other hypothesis test uses NHST
  • 20 points for explaining why something cannot be highly significant using this logic

Question 3:

  • 10 points for identifying all of the relevant variables (DV, main IV, and covariates)
  • 10 points for stating the primary hypothesis
  • 10 points for hierarchical model parsing out the covariates
  • 20 points for accurate decisions and criticism of the authors approach
December 17, 2006, at 06:27 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Added lines 101-125:
  • The following grading criteria were used to assign points to the essay responses. Please review the following criteria and see how you think you performed on the essay portion of the final exam. Your grades will be posted by the end of the day on Tuesday, December 19th.

  1. Question 1:

5 points GLM equation 5 points for error 10 points least squares procedures for parameter estimation 10 points for describing MRC in terms of the GLM 10 points for describing ANOVA in terms of the GLM 10 points for extending to multivariate procedures

  1. Question 2:

15 points for an explanation of the NHST 5 points for describing the probability model 10 points for explaining how correlation and any other hypothesis test uses NHST 20 points for explaining why something cannot be highly significant using this logic

  1. Question 3:

10 points for identifying all of the relevant variables (DV, main IV, and covariates) 10 points for stating the primary hypothesis 10 points for hierarchical model parsing out the covariates 20 points for accurate decisions and criticism of the authors approach

December 13, 2006, at 04:45 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 94-95 from:
  • Literature Review (Due December 18th): PLEASE NOTE THE NEW DUE DATE Yes, the due date changed because several students asked me to make the changes to allow them to prepare for the new final exam dates. I agreed that the new date would offer you more time to prepare for the exam and more time to generate a better paper. Please let your advisor know that grades are due on the 20th and so I will need to receive the review grades no later than noon on the 19th in order to submit those grades.
to:
  • Literature Review (Due December 18th): PLEASE NOTE THE NEW DUE DATE Yes, the due date changed because several students asked me to make the changes to allow them to prepare for the new final exam dates. I agreed that the new date would offer you more time to prepare for the exam and more time to generate a better paper. Please let your advisor know that course grades are due on the 20th so I will need to receive their review grades no later than noon on the 19th in order to submit those grades on time before I leave. Thanks.
December 13, 2006, at 04:44 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 94-95 from:
  • Literature Review (Due December 18th): PLEASE NOTE THE NEW DUE DATE Yes, the due date changed because several students asked me to make the changes to allow them to prepare for the new final exam dates. I agreed that the new date would offer you more time to prepare for the exam and more time to generate a better paper.
to:
  • Literature Review (Due December 18th): PLEASE NOTE THE NEW DUE DATE Yes, the due date changed because several students asked me to make the changes to allow them to prepare for the new final exam dates. I agreed that the new date would offer you more time to prepare for the exam and more time to generate a better paper. Please let your advisor know that grades are due on the 20th and so I will need to receive the review grades no later than noon on the 19th in order to submit those grades.
December 12, 2006, at 03:55 PM by 192.168.19.60 -
Changed lines 94-100 from:
  • Literature Review (Due December 18th): PLEASE NOTE THE NEW DUE DATE Yes, the due date changed because several students asked me to make the changes to allow them to prepare for the new final exam dates. I agreed that the new date would offer you more time to prepare for the exam and more time to generate a better paper.
to:
  • Literature Review (Due December 18th): PLEASE NOTE THE NEW DUE DATE Yes, the due date changed because several students asked me to make the changes to allow them to prepare for the new final exam dates. I agreed that the new date would offer you more time to prepare for the exam and more time to generate a better paper.


Final Exam Results

  • Here are the results of the multiple choice section of the final exam. Remember that these points get added to the essay points and then get transfored into a 0–100 scale. I will provide that score for you once the essays are graded and entered. Please look over your exam performance. Anyone interested in seeing their exam results in person is welcome to come by the MRES lab this week. I suggest you come either before 3:30pm on Thursday or between 9am and noon on Friday. Otherwise, you can see the results next week if you are still around.
December 04, 2006, at 09:58 AM by 192.168.19.60 -
Changed lines 88-89 from:
  • Essay Exam (Available: December 4th, 4:30pm, DUE December 13th, 11:59:59pm): The essay exam consists of two comprehensive questions that pertain to the article above. Please be sure to discuss the article in groups but write your own response. Please, please, please, please do not submit identical answers. We already had a bit of a problem with this and I prefer to avoid these problems altogether. Submit your answers to your TA’s via email. Send the responses as attachments or in the body of the message. Address each of the following questions in detail and limit your responses to no more than 300 words per answer.
to:
  • Essay Exam (Available: December 4th, 4:30pm, DUE December 13th, 11:59:59pm): The essay exam consists of two comprehensive questions that pertain to the article above. Please be sure to discuss the article in groups but write your own response. Please, please, please, please do not submit identical answers. We already had a bit of a problem with this and I prefer to avoid these problems altogether. Submit your answers to your TA’s via email. Send the responses as attachments or in the body of the message with the subject line reading “611 Final - Essay Questions” without the quotes. Address each of the following questions in detail and limit your responses to no more than 300 words per answer.
December 04, 2006, at 06:13 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 90-93 from:
  1. Explain the rationale of the GLM and how it helps organize the rest of the least squares procedures discussed to date. Be specific about each procedure and
  2. In the procedures section under the heading of Indenpendent Variable: Skin Tone, the authors state that ratings from two sources were “highly significantly correlated (r = .65, p < .001).” Please explain why this statement does not make sense from what you know about null-hypothesis significance testing.
  3. Describe the model used to test the primary hypothesis and explain the decisions and possible ramification of the authors choices.
to:
  1. Explain the rationale of the GLM and how it helps organize the rest of the least squares procedures discussed to date. Be specific about each procedure and make sure you provide enough detail so we know you understand the question. (50 points)
  2. In the procedures section under the heading Independent Variable: Skin Tone, the authors state that ratings from two sources were “highly significantly correlated (r = .65, p < .001).” Please explain why this statement does not make sense from what you know about null-hypothesis significance testing. (50 points)
  3. Describe the model used to test the primary hypothesis and explain the decisions and possible ramification of the authors choices. (50 points)
December 04, 2006, at 06:09 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 88-89 from:
  • Essay Exam (Available: December 4th, 4:30pm, DUE December 13th, 11:59:59pm): The essay exam consists of two comprehensive questions that pertain to the article above. Please be sure to discuss the article in groups but write your own response. Please, please, please, please do not submit identical answers. We already had a bit of a problem with this and I prefer to avoid these problems altogether.
to:
  • Essay Exam (Available: December 4th, 4:30pm, DUE December 13th, 11:59:59pm): The essay exam consists of two comprehensive questions that pertain to the article above. Please be sure to discuss the article in groups but write your own response. Please, please, please, please do not submit identical answers. We already had a bit of a problem with this and I prefer to avoid these problems altogether. Submit your answers to your TA’s via email. Send the responses as attachments or in the body of the message. Address each of the following questions in detail and limit your responses to no more than 300 words per answer.

  1. Explain the rationale of the GLM and how it helps organize the rest of the least squares procedures discussed to date. Be specific about each procedure and
  2. In the procedures section under the heading of Indenpendent Variable: Skin Tone, the authors state that ratings from two sources were “highly significantly correlated (r = .65, p < .001).” Please explain why this statement does not make sense from what you know about null-hypothesis significance testing.
  3. Describe the model used to test the primary hypothesis and explain the decisions and possible ramification of the authors choices.
November 27, 2006, at 04:18 PM by 192.168.19.60 -
Changed lines 84-90 from:
  • Article: Please read this article well in advance of the exam and be sure to bring it in with you.
to:
  • Article: Please read this article and answer the questions I will post below on December 4th, 2006.

  • Multiple Choice Exam (December 4th, 1:15pm-4:25pm): The exam will take place in the classroom on December 4th at the usual time we meet for class. I intend to open the doors, hand out the exam at about 1:15pm, and collect the last exam when the subsequent class enters the room.

  • Essay Exam (Available: December 4th, 4:30pm, DUE December 13th, 11:59:59pm): The essay exam consists of two comprehensive questions that pertain to the article above. Please be sure to discuss the article in groups but write your own response. Please, please, please, please do not submit identical answers. We already had a bit of a problem with this and I prefer to avoid these problems altogether.

  • Literature Review (Due December 18th): PLEASE NOTE THE NEW DUE DATE Yes, the due date changed because several students asked me to make the changes to allow them to prepare for the new final exam dates. I agreed that the new date would offer you more time to prepare for the exam and more time to generate a better paper.
November 27, 2006, at 06:57 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 74-84 from:
to:



Final Exam - details updated after class

  • Article: Please read this article well in advance of the exam and be sure to bring it in with you.
November 20, 2006, at 07:03 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Added lines 73-74:
November 20, 2006, at 06:20 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Added lines 70-72:

  • Lecture 11 covers ANCOVA and MAN(C)OVA. I suggest you read the chapters before class. In addition, I recommend you read over the this helpful web page. By popular demand, I intend to post the full notes this morning.
November 10, 2006, at 08:36 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 68-69 from:
  • Lecture 10 will be on the midterm summary report linked above. Please be sure to read it before the class. I intend to use the summary in our continued discussion of multiple regression.
to:
  • Lecture 10 will cover the midterm summary report linked above. Please be sure to read it before the class. I intend to use the summary in our continued discussion of multiple regression.
November 10, 2006, at 08:35 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Added lines 66-69:

  • Lecture 10 will be on the midterm summary report linked above. Please be sure to read it before the class. I intend to use the summary in our continued discussion of multiple regression.
November 10, 2006, at 08:32 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed line 63 from:
  • see midterm summary - to be posted on Wednesday, November 8th.
to:
November 07, 2006, at 06:45 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 59-65 from:
  • Lecture 8 outline with notes - coming soon.
to:


October 30, 2006, at 05:14 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Added lines 56-59:

October 18, 2006, at 06:14 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 52-53 from:

The exam is an open-book, open-notes exam. Feel free to bring whatever you desire to the exam. As I mentioned in class, the exam is rather long so I suggest you not rely on looking up material during the exam because you will run out of time. Speaking of time, I asked all students present on Monday if everyone could manage to get to the class about 15 minutes before class started (i.e., 1:15pm) and everyone said “yes” so we will begin the exam early. I know some of you were away at conferences but I trust that the 15 minute early start will not be hardship for anyone. If it is, please let me know right away. Thanks.

to:

The exam is an open-book, open-notes exam. Feel free to bring whatever you desire to the exam. As I mentioned in class, the exam is rather long so I suggest you not rely on looking up material during the exam because you will run out of time. Speaking of time, I asked all students present on Monday if everyone could manage to get to the class about 15 minutes before class started (i.e., 1:15pm) and everyone said “yes” so we will begin the exam early. I know some of you were away at conferences but I trust that the 15 minute early start will not be a hardship for anyone. If it is, please let me know right away. Thanks.

October 17, 2006, at 08:32 AM by 192.168.19.60 -
Changed lines 47-55 from:
  • Lecture 7 outline with notes coming shortly
to:


Mid-term Exam 10/23

The exam is an open-book, open-notes exam. Feel free to bring whatever you desire to the exam. As I mentioned in class, the exam is rather long so I suggest you not rely on looking up material during the exam because you will run out of time. Speaking of time, I asked all students present on Monday if everyone could manage to get to the class about 15 minutes before class started (i.e., 1:15pm) and everyone said “yes” so we will begin the exam early. I know some of you were away at conferences but I trust that the 15 minute early start will not be hardship for anyone. If it is, please let me know right away. Thanks.

  • Please read this article for the midterm and be prepared to answer questions related to the topics covered to date that pertain to this article.
October 16, 2006, at 05:21 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 42-47 from:
to:


October 11, 2006, at 10:18 AM by 192.168.19.60 -
Deleted lines 3-9:
  • Week 1 Readings:

Platt (1964)

Chamberlin (1890)

Changed lines 6-8 from:
to:
Changed lines 10-13 from:
  • Lecture 3 outline
  • Lecture 3 outline with notes
  • Relevant readings for todays lecture are Meehl’s chapter in Lisa Harlow’s (et. al.) edited volume “What if there were no significance tests?” and Will Shadish, Tom Cook, and Don Campbell’s (2002) book that expanded the ideas presented in the Campbell and Stanley monograph. In particular, I would recommend you read chapter 11 in the Shadish, Cook and Campbell book. Unfortunately I do not have an electronic copy of the chapter but there are plenty of copies of the book around the psychology department. Read these two resources if you have the time and interest.
to:
  • Week 1 Readings:

Platt (1964)

Chamberlin (1890)

Changed lines 19-22 from:
  • Lecture 4 outline
  • Lecture 4 outline with notes
  • Relevant readings: You might find Darrel Huff’s “How to lie with statistics” an entertaining read after this lecture. In addition, if you found the lecture to be difficult conceptually, I suggest you carefully consider whether the material in the text and in the lecture will be at or near your current level of knowledge. Catching up at this point may be more difficult than you imagine.
to:
Changed lines 24-26 from:
to:
  • Lecture 3 outline
  • Lecture 3 outline with notes
  • Relevant readings for todays lecture are Meehl’s chapter in Lisa Harlow’s (et. al.) edited volume “What if there were no significance tests?” and Will Shadish, Tom Cook, and Don Campbell’s (2002) book that expanded the ideas presented in the Campbell and Stanley monograph. In particular, I would recommend you read chapter 11 in the Shadish, Cook and Campbell book. Unfortunately I do not have an electronic copy of the chapter but there are plenty of copies of the book around the psychology department. Read these two resources if you have the time and interest.
Added lines 30-40:
  • Lecture 4 outline
  • Lecture 4 outline with notes
  • Relevant readings: You might find Darrel Huff’s “How to lie with statistics” an entertaining read after this lecture. In addition, if you found the lecture to be difficult conceptually, I suggest you carefully consider whether the material in the text and in the lecture will be at or near your current level of knowledge. Catching up at this point may be more difficult than you imagine.



October 10, 2006, at 11:14 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed line 36 from:
  • Lecture 6 outline with notes coming shortly
to:
October 10, 2006, at 06:44 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 31-36 from:
to:


October 02, 2006, at 04:47 PM by 192.168.19.60 -
Changed line 31 from:
  • Lecture 5 ouline with notes - coming soon.
to:
October 02, 2006, at 05:49 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Added lines 28-29:

October 02, 2006, at 05:49 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 26-29 from:
  • Relevant readings: You might find Darrel Huff’s “How to lie with statistics” an entertaining read after this lecture. In addition, if you found the lecture to be difficult conceptually, I suggest you carefully consider whether the material in the text and in the lecture will be at or near your current level of knowledge. Catching up at this point may be more difficult than you imagine.
to:
  • Relevant readings: You might find Darrel Huff’s “How to lie with statistics” an entertaining read after this lecture. In addition, if you found the lecture to be difficult conceptually, I suggest you carefully consider whether the material in the text and in the lecture will be at or near your current level of knowledge. Catching up at this point may be more difficult than you imagine.

  • Lecture 5 outline
  • Lecture 5 ouline with notes - coming soon.
September 26, 2006, at 06:24 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 25-26 from:
to:
  • Lecture 4 outline with notes
  • Relevant readings: You might find Darrel Huff’s “How to lie with statistics” an entertaining read after this lecture. In addition, if you found the lecture to be difficult conceptually, I suggest you carefully consider whether the material in the text and in the lecture will be at or near your current level of knowledge. Catching up at this point may be more difficult than you imagine.
September 26, 2006, at 06:20 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed line 25 from:
  • Lecture 4 outline with notes
to:
September 25, 2006, at 06:06 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 20-25 from:
  • Relevant readings for todays lecture are Meehl’s chapter in Lisa Harlow’s (et. al.) edited volume “What if there were no significance tests?” and Will Shadish, Tom Cook, and Don Campbell’s (2002) book that expanded the ideas presented in the Campbell and Stanley monograph. In particular, I would recommend you read chapter 11 in the Shadish, Cook and Campbell book. Unfortunately I do not have an electronic copy of the chapter but there are plenty of copies of the book around the psychology department. Read these two resources if you have the time and interest.
to:
  • Relevant readings for todays lecture are Meehl’s chapter in Lisa Harlow’s (et. al.) edited volume “What if there were no significance tests?” and Will Shadish, Tom Cook, and Don Campbell’s (2002) book that expanded the ideas presented in the Campbell and Stanley monograph. In particular, I would recommend you read chapter 11 in the Shadish, Cook and Campbell book. Unfortunately I do not have an electronic copy of the chapter but there are plenty of copies of the book around the psychology department. Read these two resources if you have the time and interest.


September 18, 2006, at 06:46 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed line 19 from:
  • Lecture 3 outline with notes
to:
September 18, 2006, at 06:44 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed line 20 from:
  • Relevant readings for todays lecture are Meehl’s chapter in Lisa Harlow’s (et. al.) edited volume “What if there were no significance tests?” and Will Shadish, Tom Cook, and Don Campbell’s (2002) book that expanded the Campbell and Stanley ideas.
to:
  • Relevant readings for todays lecture are Meehl’s chapter in Lisa Harlow’s (et. al.) edited volume “What if there were no significance tests?” and Will Shadish, Tom Cook, and Don Campbell’s (2002) book that expanded the ideas presented in the Campbell and Stanley monograph. In particular, I would recommend you read chapter 11 in the Shadish, Cook and Campbell book. Unfortunately I do not have an electronic copy of the chapter but there are plenty of copies of the book around the psychology department. Read these two resources if you have the time and interest.
September 18, 2006, at 06:42 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 19-20 from:
  • Lecture 3 outline with notes
to:
  • Lecture 3 outline with notes
  • Relevant readings for todays lecture are Meehl’s chapter in Lisa Harlow’s (et. al.) edited volume “What if there were no significance tests?” and Will Shadish, Tom Cook, and Don Campbell’s (2002) book that expanded the Campbell and Stanley ideas.
September 18, 2006, at 06:38 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 16-19 from:

to:

September 11, 2006, at 07:39 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 14-15 from:
to:
September 11, 2006, at 07:38 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 14-15 from:
  • Lecture 2 notes
to:
September 10, 2006, at 08:17 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed line 13 from:
to:
September 10, 2006, at 08:15 PM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 9-16 from:

Chamberlin (1890)

to:

Chamberlin (1890)



August 25, 2006, at 10:37 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 7-9 from:

Platt (1964)

to:

Platt (1964)

Chamberlin (1890)

August 25, 2006, at 10:36 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed line 7 from:

[[Attach: Platt Platt?

to:

Platt (1964)

August 25, 2006, at 10:36 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Changed lines 1-7 from:

hold

to:

Psychology 611

Welcome to the homepage for Psychology 611. Here you will find notes posted for the course, links to additional readings, and various tidbits you might find helpful while learning the course material.

  • Week 1 Readings:

[[Attach: Platt Platt?

August 25, 2006, at 09:40 AM by 68.100.100.206 -
Added line 1:

hold